Studying Fiqh Based on the Quran and Hadith in the Modern Era by Revisiting the Methodology of Legal Istinbat
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to re-examine the normative foundations of the Qur’an and Hadith as the primary sources of Islamic law in responding to contemporary social dynamics and legal challenges. The Qur’an is positioned as a sacred text that contains universal and eternal principles for all humankind, while the Hadith serves as a methodological guide for applying Qur’anic laws to present-day contexts. The study is grounded in the Ma‘na-Cum-Maghza theoretical framework, a contextual approach that emphasizes understanding the substantive meaning and message of the divine texts. This research adopts a qualitative method, employing literature review techniques from both classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources. The findings indicate the necessity for a renewed methodology of istinbat (legal reasoning) that is more responsive to social change, without neglecting the normative authority of Islamic legal sources. These findings are contextualized within the theoretical framework, highlighting the epistemological and methodological implications for the development of fiqh in Indonesia’s legal landscape. This study contributes originality by integrating the Ma‘na-Cum-Maghza approach with istinbat methodology, thereby enriching the discourse of contemporary Islamic legal studies and offering a new direction for lawmaking grounded in maqashid shariah and social justice. The findings provide practical insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in the field of Islamic law.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
References
Akmal, Andi Muhammad, M. (2024). Analysis of the Theory of the Enactment of Islamic Law : Implications and Challenges in the Indonesian Context. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(2), 49–56.
Al-Qur’an. (2022). ar_Mushaf_Almadina.pdf. In Almadina. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/1?from=1&to=7. https://doi.org/10.33102/jqss.vol7no2.189
Asghari, S. A. H. (2023). Understanding Human Dignity in Shi’i Islam: Debates, Challenges, and Solutions for Contemporary Issues. Religions, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040505
Hassan, R. (1982). Human Rights in the Qur’anic Perspective. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 19(3), 241–248.
Ishaq, I., & Ridwan, M. (2023). A study of umar bin Khatab’s Ijtihad in an effort to formulate Islamic law reform. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2265522
Mappasessu, Kurniati, M. (2024). The Sociological Roots of the Emergence of Terrorism in Indonesia : An Interdisciplinary Approach. Journal of Strafvordering, 1(3), 10–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62872/5rddn156
Mappasessu. (2024). Analysis of the Role of Judicial Institutions in Sharia Economic Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economy, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62872/t7yh4453
Mappasessu. (2025). Islamic Law Principles as a Pillar of Ideal Civilization and Global Stability. ICORCS, 4(1), 95–110. https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/ICORcs/article/view/6627
Muhammad Fu‘ad Abdul Baqi. (2017). Shahih Bukhari Muslim. http://103.44.149.34/elib/assets/buku/Shahih_bukhari_muslim.pdf
Nafisah, D., Nasrudin, Meidina, A. R., & Zain, M. F. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Normative Law: Examining the Causes of Divorce in Purwokerto, Indonesia. Samarah, 8(2), 846–871. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.16825
Ni'mah, A., & Arifin, A. (2020). Perbandingan Metode Term Weighting terhadap Hasil Klasifikasi Teks pada Dataset Terjemahan Kitab Hadis. Rekayasa, 13(2), 172-180. doi:https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v13i2.6412
Nurnazli, Pane, E., Al Arif, M. Y., & Akmansyah, M. (2024). Productive Dowry and Women’s Economic Empowerment and Their Influence on Marital Assets in Bandar Lampung. Samarah, 8(2), 954–979. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.19887
Sahiron, S. (2017). Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Quran.pdf (p. 271).
Shah, N. A. (2013). The use of force under islamic law. European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht013
Syamsuddin, S. (2020). Pendekatan Ma’na-Cum-Maghza Atas Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis: Menjawab Problematika Sosial Keagamaan Di Era Kontemporer. Lembaga Ladang Kata, 8.
Thahir, A. H. (2024). Towards the Multidimensional Ushul Al-Fiqh: A Study of the Integration of Science in the Fatwa of Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Samarah, 8(2), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.19686
Wimra, Z., Huda, Y., Bunaiya, M., & Hakimi, A. R. (2023). The Living Fiqh: Anatomy, Philosophical Formulation, and Scope of Study. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 22(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.9491
Yusefri, Faizin, M., & Jafar, W. A. (2024). Protecting Child Labor Rights: Maqasid Sharia Framework and Policy Recommendations. Samarah, 8(2), 1187–1215. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.24559
Zayyadi, A., Ridwan, Hidayat, A., Ubaidillah, & Masuwd, M. A. (2023). Understanding of Legal Reform on Sociology of Islamic Law: Its Relevance to Islamic Family Law in Indonesia. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 17(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.7584
Х ЕЛМИ, Й. (2024). От Исламского Модернизма К Теоретизированию Авторитаризма. American Journal of Islam and Society, 38(3--4), 36–70. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v38i3--4.3444